Processed red meats—like bacon, deli meats, and hot dogs—are linked to a host of health ills. Now, the latest study finds that eating too much red meat may even harm the brain.
In a study published in the journal Neurology, Dr. Daniel Wang, an assistant professor of medicine at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, and his team report that people who eat more processed red meat had a 14% higher risk of developing dementia over more than four decades that those who consumed minimal amounts.
The study analyzed data from more than 130,000 health professionals enrolled in two major studies: the Nurses' Health Study and the Health Professionals Follow-Up Study. Every two to four years, people filled out detailed dietary surveys asking about their intake of more than 150 foods. The researchers also collected health data on dementia diagnoses and asked people brief questions about their memory.
“Based on this data, we see that if people have higher processed red meat intake, they have a higher risk of dementia, a higher risk of subjective cognitive decline, and worse cognitive function,” says Wang.
The scientists saw increased risk of all of these outcomes with any consumption of processed red meat, and it continued to increase the more meat a person consumed. The 14% increased dementia risk was the upper threshold.
It didn't take much meat to reach that upper limit. The 14% higher risk of dementia was linked to people who ate at least a quarter of a single 3-oz. serving of processed red meat daily—equivalent to two slices of bacon, one and a half slices of bologna, or a hot dog—compared to those who ate less than a tenth of a serving (less than a slice of bacon) a day.
Wang plans to keep studying these populations to better understand how processed red meat affects the brain, and possibly dementia. One theory is that processed meat, because of its high saturated fat and sodium, can increase the risk of diabetes and heart conditions, in part by raising blood pressure, and thus harming the brain. Another is based on the fact that that some of the compounds the body makes when it breaks down processed red meat can increase the risk of dementia; in the lab, for example, some of these compounds cause the clumping of amyloid protein that is a hallmark of Alzheimer’s disease. Finally, the nitrites found in processed red meats may damage DNA, injuring brain cells.
Previous studies of processed red meat and dementia have been inconsistent, with some finding a connection and others not. Wang says those studies were smaller and followed people for less time, without evaluating people's diets more than once. His team's approach, on the other hand, “captured changes in dietary intake during decades-long follow up, which is the strength our study has,” he says.
The detailed dietary data also allowed them to estimate what effect replacing red meat would have on dementia risk. Substituting one serving a day of processed red meat with nuts or legumes contributed to a 19% lower risk of dementia over the study period; similarly, replacing red meat with fish was linked to a 28% lower risk of dementia. Eating chicken instead of red meat for one serving daily contributed to a 16% lower dementia risk.
The data also allowed Wang’s team to compare people who ate more processed red meat to those who ate more unprocessed red meat. Those who ate more unprocessed red meat did show a slightly higher risk of dementia compared to people eating minimal amounts, but this association wasn’t statistically significant.
However, on the scale that measured people’s own assessments of their cognitive function, those who ate unprocessed red meat had a 16% higher risk of having memory issues than those who ate minimal amounts. This subjective assessment included six to seven yes-or-no questions, including whether they had more difficulty remembering the names of close friends in the past year compared to the previous year, or whether they had problems finding their way home in the past year.
While this subjective assessment does not measure dementia specifically, it measures memory problems and is “very sensitive,” says Wang, often detecting signs of cognitive decline earlier than more standardized tests. It may therefore be a useful tool for alerting doctors to potential emerging cognitive problems. Wang plans to continue following these populations in order to determine if the subjective assessments of memory issues lead to more dementia findings on standardized testing over time.
“The take-home message is that if you can limit your red meat intake, then please do it,” says Wang. “If you reduce your intake even a little bit, it will give you cognitive health benefits. And if you do it earlier, then even better.”
Important Notice: This article was originally published at https://time.com by Alice Park where all credits are due.
Disclaimer
The watching, interacting, and participation of any kind with anything on this page does not constitute or initiate a doctor-patient relationship with Veripeudic.com. None of the statements here have been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The products of Veripeudic.com are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. The information being provided should only be considered for education and entertainment purposes only. If you feel that anything you see or hear may be of value to you on this page or on any other medium of any kind associated with, showing, or quoting anything relating to Veripeudic.com in any way at any time, you are encouraged to and agree to consult with a licensed healthcare professional in your area to discuss it. If you feel that you’re having a healthcare emergency, seek medical attention immediately. The views expressed here are simply either the views and opinions of Veripeudic.com or others appearing and are protected under the first amendment.
Veripeudic.com promotes evidence-based natural approaches to health, which means integrating her individual scientific and clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. By individual clinical expertise, I refer to the proficiency and judgment that individual clinicians acquire through clinical experience and clinical practice.
Veripeudic.com does not make any representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness, or completeness of any multimedia content provided. Veripeudic.com does not warrant the performance, effectiveness, or applicability of any sites listed, linked, or referenced to, in, or by any multimedia content.
To be clear, the multimedia content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health providers with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read or seen in any website, video, image, or media of any kind. Veripeudic.com hereby disclaims any and all liability to any party for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental, or other consequential damages arising directly or indirectly from any use of the content, which is provided as is, and without warranties.
