Some research has found a link between tattoos and an increased risk of cancer, and recent evidence appears to suggest that tattoos could heighten the risk of blood cancer, in particular. What biological mechanisms might explain this link, and should people really worry about the health implications of getting a tattoo? This podcast episode takes a deep dive into the latest evidence.
Tattoos can be strikingly beautiful forms of art, and they are increasingly popular. According to a Pew Research Center survey conducted in 2023, 32% of Americans have at least one tattoo, and 22% have several.
Beyond adorning the body on a permanent basis, tattoos can also provide a meaningful way of commemorating important life events, or they can be symbols of mental and emotional healing.
However, some questions remain around the potential health implications of getting a tattoo, and recently, researchers have been homing in on the ways in which tattooing could affect a person’s physical health in the long run.
One study, published in Applied and Environmental Microbiology at the start of July 2024, tested samples of 75 tattoo and permanent makeup inks commonly used in the United States, and found that 26 of these were contaminated with infection-causing bacteria.
These included Staphylococcus epidermidis, an infection that can cause severe health complications, and Cutibacterium acnes, which causes acne.
More worryingly, a study from Lund University, in Sweden, which appeared in the journal eClinical Medicine the previous month, found that any-size tattoo was linked to a 21% higher link of lymphoma, a type of blood cancer.
To identify this link, the Lund researchers looked at data from the Swedish National Cancer Register, focusing on people who were 20–60 years old, when they received a lymphoma diagnosis, between 2007 and 2017.
But what does this link mean? How come tattoos may increase the risk of blood cancer? Are some types of tattoos riskier than others, and if so why?
Finally, how worried should people be about getting cancer if they have tattoos, and what should they keep in mind when considering whether or not to get a tattoo?
To explore these and other questions, Medical News Today editors and co-hosts Maria Cohut and Yasemin Nikola Sakay invited Milena Foerster, PhD, a researcher who specializes in the link between tattoos and cancer, on this latest In Conversation podcast episode.
Foerster conducts her research at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO), in Lyon, France.
In this episode, we also heard from another MNT editor, Andrea Rice, who shared the story of her journey with tattoos, and the questions she had concerning associated health risks, and the potential limitations of studies looking at this association.
Listen to our podcast episode in full below or on your preferred streaming platform.
Important Notice: This article was originally published at www.medicalnewstoday.com by Maria Cohut, Ph.D. where all credits are due. Fact checked by Jill Seladi-Schulman, Ph.D.
Disclaimer
The watching, interacting, and participation of any kind with anything on this page does not constitute or initiate a doctor-patient relationship with Veripeudic.com. None of the statements here have been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The products of Veripeudic.com are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. The information being provided should only be considered for education and entertainment purposes only. If you feel that anything you see or hear may be of value to you on this page or on any other medium of any kind associated with, showing, or quoting anything relating to Veripeudic.com in any way at any time, you are encouraged to and agree to consult with a licensed healthcare professional in your area to discuss it. If you feel that you’re having a healthcare emergency, seek medical attention immediately. The views expressed here are simply either the views and opinions of Veripeudic.com or others appearing and are protected under the first amendment.
Veripeudic.com promotes evidence-based natural approaches to health, which means integrating her individual scientific and clinical expertise with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic research. By individual clinical expertise, I refer to the proficiency and judgment that individual clinicians acquire through clinical experience and clinical practice.
Veripeudic.com does not make any representation or warranties with respect to the accuracy, applicability, fitness, or completeness of any multimedia content provided. Veripeudic.com does not warrant the performance, effectiveness, or applicability of any sites listed, linked, or referenced to, in, or by any multimedia content.
To be clear, the multimedia content is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health providers with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Never disregard professional medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read or seen in any website, video, image, or media of any kind. Veripeudic.com hereby disclaims any and all liability to any party for any direct, indirect, implied, punitive, special, incidental, or other consequential damages arising directly or indirectly from any use of the content, which is provided as is, and without warranties.
